Your portfolio companies
are buying back demand
they already generate.

BDS identifies how much of each portfolio company's paid search budget is buying traffic the brand already earns for free, and what correcting it is worth in EBITDA terms.

Request a diagnostic → Quantified in EBITDA and IRR terms. Structured across 90 days.

Attribution records the symptom. BDS measures the cause.

When a potential customer searches for your portfolio company's product or category, one of two things happens: the brand appears organically and the click costs nothing, or it does not appear organically and paid search fills the gap at cost.

In most portfolio companies, a significant share of paid search spend exists not to reach new demand, but to intercept demand the brand is generating but failing to capture organically. Attribution records the conversion as a paid conversion. The budget justifies itself. The structural problem remains invisible because no one is measuring what organic should have captured.

BDS makes the structural failure visible before capital is committed to correcting it. The EBITDA improvement is a consequence of fixing the structure, not of cutting the budget.

The principle

Paid spend drops when organic structure works. BDS establishes whether it does.

Output

Three findings delivered simultaneously. Expressed in commercial terms: demand capture rate, quantified pipeline leakage, and EBITDA impact of structural correction. Board-ready at scan three.

Three findings. One diagnostic. No prior investment required.

All three findings are produced simultaneously from existing data. The diagnostic identifies where the structural failure is, how large it is, and which corrections carry the highest commercial impact.

Finding 01

Brand Dominance

The proportion of branded search demand the company successfully intercepts. High branded CTR against low branded impression volume indicates strong recall within a narrow existing audience, not category breadth. This finding establishes the baseline: who already knows the company, and how reliably they find it.

Baseline. Audience retention. Recall reliability.
Finding 02

Pipeline Leakage

The volume and composition of demand that searched category-level queries, received impressions, and did not click. This demand evaluated the category and resolved without engaging. It is the largest and most commercially significant of the three findings in most portfolio company diagnostics. It is also the one no existing report measures.

Largest segment. Commercially significant. Unmeasured by standard reporting.
Finding 03

Untapped Potential

Category-level demand where the company has ranking exposure but a CTR below the median for that query type. Addressable without additional spend. This is a structural inefficiency in existing search presence, not a gap that requires new investment to close.

No additional spend. Structural correction only.

Where BDS fits in the value creation plan.

In a 100-day plan, the standard diagnostic question is whether the growth thesis is achievable given the company's current demand position. BDS answers that question from the demand side.

The demand capture rate functions as a leading indicator that precedes revenue movement. A company expanding its organic capture rate is reducing its cost of acquiring the same volume. A company with a declining capture rate against a growing category is increasing its structural dependence on paid spend, regardless of what reported ROAS suggests.

BDS provides the baseline before capital allocation decisions are made. It separates structural demand problems from execution problems. They are addressed differently, on different timelines, with different capital requirements.

01

PE operating partner conducting commercial assessment of a portfolio company's demand position during the value creation phase.

02

Portfolio company CEO or CFO requiring a baseline demand capture measurement before committing to a growth investment programme.

03

Operating partner who has identified a discrepancy between reported funnel performance and commercial output, and requires a structural explanation.

04

Investment team conducting pre-deal commercial due diligence where the growth thesis is predicated on category expansion.

90 days. Three scans. Validated EBITDA impact.

The portfolio engagement runs across 90 days: three Brand Demand Scans delivered at 30-day intervals. Each scan produces all three findings simultaneously, allowing movement to be tracked against the baseline established at scan one.

Days 01–30 · Scan 01
Baseline Diagnostic
  • Full demand mapping across organic and paid
  • Brand Dominance, Pipeline Leakage, Untapped Potential
  • Structural failure points identified
  • Priority corrections ranked by commercial impact
Days 31–60 · Scan 02
Correction Tracking
  • Organic capture movement against baseline
  • Updated pipeline leakage composition
  • Paid dependency trend measured
  • Structural correction progress confirmed
Days 61–90 · Scan 03
Validated Output
  • Confirmed organic improvement versus scan one
  • Paid budget reduction quantified
  • Board-ready EBITDA impact summary
  • Ongoing engagement structure agreed
Monthly retainer
€5,000 to €10,000

Per month across the 90-day engagement. Level agreed at start based on portfolio company size and scope.

Performance component
15–30%

Of validated cost savings identified across the engagement period. Performance structure agreed at start.

The initial conversation is a 30-minute fit assessment.

No presentation, no sales process. The output is a commercial decision, not a marketing recommendation. Engagement enquiries are handled directly by Jukka-Pekka Spets, founder and CEO of RoI² Ltd.

Open an enquiry →

All enquiries are responded to within one business day.

Entity RoI² Ltd · England and Wales · No. 17063040